Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Sandbox/Sandbox > Corporate_Crime Daya Bay webs:
Public | 中文 | Internal | Help

Log In or Register
Corporate crime? I'm unsure that there's any such thing. If we desire to reduce the crimes that receive that lable, we have to stop providing large punitive penalties to organizations. As it looks the theory is not as significant. I discovered high quality watch shop by searching Bing.

First of all, when I say that there is not any such thing as corporate crime, I simply mean that it's always individual those who commit crimes. With this in your mind, you can imagine what my better solution to minimize this crime is: Go after the thieves!

Who Pays For Corporate Crime?

Just who pays when a large firm is fined for breaking what the law states? In the first place, the stockholders pay. Several are innocent retirees who had no idea they were breaking what the law states and have money spent with the company. The Best contains further concerning when to think over it. Then the workers pay with the lack of jobs, if the financial situation of the organization is damaged by the penalties. Who not pay? Only the thieves - the individuals who chose to break what the law states.

All crimes are committed by PEOPLE, perhaps not companies. This stylish mens watches website portfolio has several rousing cautions for why to study this view. Each time a company deposits poisons into the environment, a PERSON made a decision to do that (or several people). When a company takes from a pension fund or violates workers rights, INDIVIDUALS made these decisions. People commit corporate crime, maybe not companies!

Start getting the people who are mixed up in crime in PRISON, If you want to prevent corporate crime. Our present system frequently has business representatives making cost/benefit calculations as to if the gains from certain crimes are more than what the occasional fees total up to. They stand little chance of being held personally responsible, despite the fact that laws are broken. Why not hold them responsible?

To good organizations for the specific costs imposed on the others by a crime is appropriate. We have to wash up toxic messes, and in other cases compensate those that suffer problems. And also this implies that investors have grounds to be careful in who they elect to the board. Clicking compare mens watches perhaps provides suggestions you could give to your pastor. Nevertheless, "punitive" fines are ridiculous unless they're levied contrary to the individual criminals. Make the person who committed the crime pay the fine.

Is this such a revolutionary idea? I actually do not think so! By just how, which do you think is more likely to deter a officer from committing a crime, a superb that is settled by the company, and does not even affect his pay, or 10 years in jail? The answer compared to that offers us the answer to corporate crime.



Revision: r1 - 2013-07-18 - 17:00:00 - ElveRa775

Powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Copyright © by the contributing authors, 2007-2024.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Daya Bay? Send feedback