It might be Queen, but it is certainly not King and I will inform you why. I'm really sick and tired of hearing the virtues of information when most of the search-engines put more value on off-site impacts. To study more, please peep at: survivalseeds4patriots review. If information actually were king and you had five websites that were all for a passing fancy issue, well crafted and optimized, how would the major search engines decide which site was most appropriate? One of those sites is going to have to be first and one of those sites is going to have to be tenth. Well, Google found a remedy because of this and that's off-site influences, particularly link acceptance - sites relating to your internet site. For another perspective, we understand you check-out: power4patriots scam. Each site connecting to you is a "vote" for the site expressing, "this site is all about so and so."
This off-site influence is so powerful that sites can rank extremely well for terms that do not even occur in the site's content. In the event that you search "miserable failure" on Google the #1 site is Biography of President George Bush. This novel power 4patriots paper has assorted surprising suggestions for where to recognize it. If you search the copy on the website you'll find that the definition of "miserable failure" doesn't even exist on the site. If content is king just how can a site rank #1 for a term that will not even exist on the page? Is not this telling us that information really isn't king and that link popularity is really the reigning power?
I have a niche site that I put up for my mom's book all about chastity, sex and relationships. The whole book is available to read on line both on html pages or pdfs. The information is applicable and beautifully written. We discovered more information by searching Google. Is is # 1 for chastity in just about any of the search engines? No. Why? Since it lacks link popularity.
Material is not King and probably never will be. It certainly helps, but it will never give the weight to you searching engines that link popularity does today.
Copyright © by the contributing authors, 2007-2024.